Why Lapu-Lapu Statue Doesn’t Have Tattooes?
29th, 2005 by jorge
Funny, isn’t it?
This subject aroused my curiosity to tackle a little bit about this historical lapse when I read an article in Freeman online publication about the Cebuano body. It talked about the tattooed bodies of the pre-Hispanic Cebuanos.
In the history books, Lapu-Lapu and other natives of Zugbu, now known as Cebu, were portrayed as ‘pintados’ or tattooed ones. It was believed that the natives painted their bodies as a sign of gallantry and a status symbol. If indeed it is a sign of valour and bravery, then why do Lapu-Lapu’s statues not bear any tattoo on his body? Was it intentional or a mental lapse?
Is it because the sculptor was not a Cebuano? Or is it because the sculptor didn’t know much about the hero? Or the people who commissioned the statues were amnesiac or simply ignorant of their own local history that they weren’t aware that Lapu-Lapu was a tatooed warrior?
Now, fellow Cebuanos, go over your history book and reread it over and over again. Find out if the Lapu-Lapu statue that you see in the Provincial Capitol front lawn is not someone else. Imagine an image of a Dalmatian dog without those distinctive dark spots all over his body. Would you still call it a Dalmatian?
Now, go to the Capitol grounds and take a closer look at Lapu-Lapu’s statue. Please give me your opinion about this interesting topic.
Permalink
Filed under: 


let me take some gues, maybe it wasnt fit for Lapu Lapu to have a tattoed body…or Lapu-Lapu screamed when the sculptor tried to put some tatoo and he runaway with fear…hehehe